CVE-2026-23233
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to avoid mapping wrong physical block for swapfile Xiaolong Guo reported a f2fs bug in bugzilla [1] [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220951 Quoted: "When using stress-ng's swap stress test on F2FS filesystem with kernel 6.6+, the system experiences data corruption leading to either: 1 dm-verity corruption errors and device reboot 2 F2FS node corruption errors and boot hangs The issue occurs specifically when: 1 Using F2FS filesystem (ext4 is unaffected) 2 Swapfile size is less than F2FS section size (2MB) 3 Swapfile has fragmented physical layout (multiple non-contiguous extents) 4 Kernel version is 6.6+ (6.1 is unaffected) The root cause is in check_swap_activate() function in fs/f2fs/data.c. When the first extent of a small swapfile (< 2MB) is not aligned to section boundaries, the function incorrectly treats it as the last extent, failing to map subsequent extents. This results in incorrect swap_extent creation where only the first extent is mapped, causing subsequent swap writes to overwrite wrong physical locations (other files' data). Steps to Reproduce 1 Setup a device with F2FS-formatted userdata partition 2 Compile stress-ng from https://github.com/ColinIanKing/stress-ng 3 Run swap stress test: (Android devices) adb shell "cd /data/stressng; ./stress-ng-64 --metrics-brief --timeout 60 --swap 0" Log: 1 Ftrace shows in kernel 6.6, only first extent is mapped during second f2fs_map_blocks call in check_swap_activate(): stress-ng-swap-8990: f2fs_map_blocks: ino=11002, file offset=0, start blkaddr=0x43143, len=0x1 (Only 4KB mapped, not the full swapfile) 2 in kernel 6.1, both extents are correctly mapped: stress-ng-swap-5966: f2fs_map_blocks: ino=28011, file offset=0, start blkaddr=0x13cd4, len=0x1 stress-ng-swap-5966: f2fs_map_blocks: ino=28011, file offset=1, start blkaddr=0x60c84b, len=0xff The problematic code is in check_swap_activate(): if ((pblock - SM_I(sbi)->main_blkaddr) % blks_per_sec || nr_pblocks % blks_per_sec || !f2fs_valid_pinned_area(sbi, pblock)) { bool last_extent = false; not_aligned++; nr_pblocks = roundup(nr_pblocks, blks_per_sec); if (cur_lblock + nr_pblocks > sis->max) nr_pblocks -= blks_per_sec; /* this extent is last one */ if (!nr_pblocks) { nr_pblocks = last_lblock - cur_lblock; last_extent = true; } ret = f2fs_migrate_blocks(inode, cur_lblock, nr_pblocks); if (ret) { if (ret == -ENOENT) ret = -EINVAL; goto out; } if (!last_extent) goto retry; } When the first extent is unaligned and roundup(nr_pblocks, blks_per_sec) exceeds sis->max, we subtract blks_per_sec resulting in nr_pblocks = 0. The code then incorrectly assumes this is the last extent, sets nr_pblocks = last_lblock - cur_lblock (entire swapfile), and performs migration. After migration, it doesn't retry mapping, so subsequent extents are never processed. " In order to fix this issue, we need to lookup block mapping info after we migrate all blocks in the tail of swapfile.
EPSS 0.02% · 4.8th percentile
Risk Scores
Affected Products
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.9, 6.13, 6.19 |
Exploit Intelligence
- 4081.3.7.yml (github-poc)
- 4081.3.7.yml (github-poc)
- 4081.3.7.yml (github-poc)
- 4081.3.7.yml (github-poc)
- test_collectors.py (github-poc)
- test_collectors.py (github-poc)
- test_collectors.py (github-poc)
- test_collectors.py (github-poc)
Timeline
- Mar 4, 2026 CVE Published
- Mar 5, 2026 EPSS Score
- Mar 6, 2026 EPSS Score
- Mar 7, 2026 EPSS Score
- Mar 9, 2026 EPSS Score
- Mar 10, 2026 EPSS Score
- Mar 11, 2026 EPSS Score
- Mar 12, 2026 EPSS Score
- Mar 14, 2026 EPSS Score
- Mar 15, 2026 EPSS Score
- Mar 16, 2026 EPSS Score
- Mar 17, 2026 EPSS Score
References
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2026/msg00071.html advisory
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2026/msg00072.html advisory
- https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27448 advisory
- https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-71265 advisory
- https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23243 advisory
- https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27135 advisory
- https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23241 advisory
- https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-71267 advisory
- https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23266 advisory
- https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23259 advisory
- https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23267 advisory
- https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23248 advisory
- https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23233 advisory
- https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-71239 advisory
- https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32775 advisory
- https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-71266 advisory
- https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27459 advisory
- https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23242 advisory
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1ff415eef513bf12deb058fc50d57788c46c48e6 patch
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5c145c03188bc9ba1c29e0bc4d527a5978fc47f9 patch
…and 4 more